Research File Report
|
The following is the text of the research report on the issue of Mary
Paterson whose name appears under the list of WWII soldiers killed after
the Great War.
All of the soldiers shown on that panel of the Victoria Park
Cenotaph are WWII soldiers, other than Smilllie (Korea), Paterson (this
error) and Dixon (may be WWI Merchant Navy).
A complete copy of this report is available on this
web site as a WORD Document (text only) or as an ADOBE PDF Document
(with all attachments - large file).
|
 |
Reported By:
Richard Laughton, April 2008
Soldier Name:
Mary Paterson (Civilian)
Unit Affiliation:
Queen Mary's Army Auxiliary Corps, British Army
Date of Death:
May 30, 1918
Reported Link:
Daughter of Private and Mrs. John Paterson of Milton
Milton Historical Society Publications (MHS)
Census Reports:
Not located on 1901 or 1911 Canadian Census Documents
Not located in United Kingdom Genealogical Records
Action Required:
Remove name from Milton Victoria Park Cenotaph
Correct references in MHS WWI Publication
Web Site References:
Milton
Historical Society – WWI Records
Imperial
War Museum QMAAC
Abbeville
Cemetery Reports
Abbeville
Cemetery Extension Reports
U.K.
National Archives
Scarlet
Finders
Australian War Museum
Scotland's People
– Genealogical Records
Library
and Archives Canada
Summary Comments:
Mary Paterson's name was incorrectly added to the
Milton Cenotaph in Victoria Park in 2004 as the result of historic
newspaper reports. There
were no authoritative records searched or located to substantiate the
addition of that person's name to a Canadian War Memorial. It now
appears that person did not exist and thus the name needs to be removed
from the Milton Victoria Park Cenotaph.
A letter was sent from the QMAAC to Private and
Mrs. John Paterson reporting the death of Mrs. Paterson’s daughter on
May 30, 1918. The nursing
sisters and associates were killed in their bunker as the result of an
aerial torpedo. The letter
does not refer to the daughter by the name “Mary Paterson” and there
are no records to indicate that a Mary Paterson was killed on that date
or was buried at the cemetery where all those killed were interred.
There is no record in the United Kingdom Genealogical Records of that
era to record a person by the name of Mary Paterson.
There are no records in the United Kingdom National Archives
relative to any person serving in the Great War with the name of “Mary
Paterson” in the QMAAC. Most
significantly, there is no record of a “Mary Paterson” being buried
with the nursing sisters at any of the facilities associated with the
Abbeville Cemetery.
There are no records in Canada of a Mary Paterson
from the QMAAC having resided in the Town of Milton, the County of
Halton or in fact anywhere in Ontario or Canada.
If this “Mary Paterson” did exist, which is unlikely, that
person never resided in Canada and thus should not be reported on a
Canadian War Memorial. Researchers
in the United Kingdom suggest that It is highly unlikely that a resident
of Canada would have been a domestic in the United Kingdom who served
with the QMAAC.
It is my belief that the person thought to have
been “Mary Paterson” was in fact the person known as “Mary
Blaikley”. She was one of
the nursing sisters killed in the aerial torpedo attack and is buried in
the Abbeville Cemetery Extension. This
“Mary” was an illegitimate child, the daughter of Elizabeth
Blaikley. There is no information for or against a supposition that John
Paterson was the father of the illegitimate child, although he is known
that have been from that area. Mary
could have been the daughter of Mrs. Paterson through a previous
relationship.
There is no evidence that this “Mary” ever travelled to or resided
in Canada, so even if she was the child of John Paterson, it should not
be shown on a Canadian War Memorial.
Research Details:
The following
information is available for the review of this matter.
1.
Mary Paterson on
the Milton Cenotaph
The cenotaph showing Mary Paterson’s name is in Attachment #1.
Mary Paterson is the only female listed on the Milton Ontario Cenotaph.
Her name was not added to the Cenotaph until 2004. She was reported to
have been serving with the Queen Mary's Army Auxiliary Corps of the
British Expeditionary Force. Although a civilian unit, the women were at
the front undertaking tasks that would free the men to move to the front
lines. It is reported that 8 officials (civilian officers) and 75
members (civilian soldiers) were killed during the war.
Mary Paterson’s name was added to the cenotaph on the basis of a
number of pieces of circumstantial evidence that would have logically
led one to believe that she was in fact Mary Paterson, daughter of
Private and Mrs. Paterson of Milton.
It is only when one tries to follow the path to confirm these
facts that the case begins to crumble.
It would appear that the name should not be on the cenotaph as this
person did not live in Canada. In
addition, her last name was not Paterson.
There are NO RECORDS anywhere to support the contention that
there was a Mary Paterson whose name should be on the Milton Cenotaph to
honour Canada’s war dead.
2.
Library and
Archives Canada
The document is provided in Attachment #2.
These records were used to show that John Paterson, Service Number 57706
listed a Mrs. John Paterson of his next of kin when he attested on
November 17, 1914. His birth
date is given as July 7, 1875 so he was 39 years old when he attested
and would have been 43 when “Mary” was killed in the aerial torpedo
attack. There are no records
to show any link between Private John Paterson and a daughter by the
name of “Mary”, in the United Kingdom or in Canada.
John Paterson was old enough to have had a 20 year old daughter in 1918.
3.
The Letters
to Private and Mrs. Paterson
Copies of the letters are provided in Attachment #3.
There were two (2) letters written to the Paterson family in Milton, as
recovered by Jim Dills of the Milton Historical Society during his
research of the archived copies of the Milton Champion.
A letter from Mary’s superior dated June 1, 1918 reports that Mary (no
last name given) was killed by an aerial torpedo dropped from an enemy
plane at 2 o'clock in the morning of May 30, 1918. She and her comrades
were in an underground shelter. The bombs were dropped on Camp 1 and
eight (8) were killed immediately, one (1) later and seven (7) others
were slightly wounded.
The details in the letter describing the funeral of those killed are in
general agreement with the historical details of the funeral service and
burial at Abbeville Cemetery Extension (see also attachments 4 and 6).
That would lend support to the supposition that the Mary referred to in
the letter was one of those killed in that attack and that Mary is
buried in the Abbeville Cemetery Extension.
It is important to note that the letter is addressed to “Madam”
(Paterson perhaps at that time) and that there is no reference to her
being the daughter of Mr. and Mrs. Paterson, nor is she ever referred to
as a Paterson in the letter. She
is only referred to as her “daughter”.
Whoever wrote the story in the July 4, 1918 edition of the
Champion refers to her as the “eldest daughter of Private and Mrs.
John Paterson”, which they may have logically (but incorrectly)
assumed to be the fact. No
evidence was found to suggest that Mr. and Mrs. John Paterson had a
daughter named “Mary Paterson”.
A second letter dated June 9, 1918 was referenced in the Champion of
July 4, 1918. This letter
came from Gartcosh, Scotland from a May Harris.
It directly refers to her whole life being spent in her
grandfather’s home (an important link to be discussed later – see
attachment #8), where her Aunt Jennie (sister to the person now married
to John Paterson). Mary was
noted as being the first and only girl to leave Gartcosh to serve her
King and Country (another important link).
There was only one Mary from Gartcosh killed in the Great War
and that was Mary Blaikley.
4.
The Commonwealth
War Graves Commission
The records of the CWGC pertaining to Mary Blaikley are provide
in Attachment #4 as there are no records of Mary Paterson.
The Commonwealth War Graves Commission (CWGC) is an
international body that catalogues all known war dead in the Great War
and maintains all of the cemeteries where they are buried and the grave
registrations. The CWGC has
one of the most used and authoritative reference data bases in the
world, which is routinely updated and corrected.
The Canadian Virtual War Memorial reports the death of all
Canadian’s who perished in the Great War, based on the CWGC records.
There is neither a Mary Paterson nor a Mary Blaikley listed on
the federal registry, so there is no acknowledgement of the existence of
either of these names as a Canadian War Casualty.
There are no Mary Paterson names listed in the CWGC for the Great War.
That is strong confirmation that no person by that name was
killed in the Great War, as either a civilian or a soldier.
Mary Blaikley and all the other Nursing Sisters who were killed
in the aerial torpedo attack of May 30, 1918 are recorded on the CWGC
site and are buried in the Abbeville Cemetery Extension.
The fact that Mary Paterson is not listed on the CWGC site should have
been the first indication that Mary Paterson did not exist.
If there was any proof that there was a Mary Paterson, the CWGC
would research that name and determined if that person should be added
to the database. Unfortunately,
there is insufficient evidence to even convince the CWGC that there may
have been a Mary Paterson, as she is never mentioned by name in any of
the records reported.
5.
Information from Scarlet Finders
The Nominal Roll of those killed on May 30, 1918 is provided in
Attachment #5.
Sue Light is a primary researcher of nurses and nursing
assistants in the Great War. Sue
was able to provide a copy of the “Official List” (Nominal Roll) of
the QMAAC that were killed in the torpedo attack of May 30, 1918.
We were able to enhance that list using modern computer
technology so that we could read all the names, service numbers,
employment and next-of-kin.
The official list has no reference to anyone by the name of Mary
Paterson or anyone with the last name Paterson.
However this list does lend support to the supposition that the
person thought to have been Mary Paterson was in fact Mary Blaikley
(#31503), as that person lists her grandfather (Mr. James Blaikley) as
her next of kin.
6.
Australian War
Museum
The records of the AWM are provided in Attachment #6.
The records of the Australian War Museum contain the only known
photographic evidence related to this matter, in that they have a
photograph of the funeral procession to the Abbeville Cemetery
Extension. They also have a
photograph of the nurses tending to the graves of their fallen comrades.
The photograph taken on May 31, 1918 lists the names of those
killed in the raid, as well as all others that were listed as the 25
pall bearers.
This list provides independent confirmation that there was no
Mary Paterson in the group, as one of those killed or as one of the
comrades. Mary Blaikley is
reported as one of those killed. The
photograph is unique in that the people in the photograph are numbered
and their names are listed.
7.
United Kingdom
National Archives
The UKNA Medal Index Card for Mary Blaikley is provided in Attachment #
7.
The National Archives of the United Kingdom have medal cards for all of
those that served in the Great War.
If there was a Mary Paterson, she would have had a medal card, as
she clearly served in a front line position and was killed in action.
There are no records in these archives of any Mary Paterson in
the QMAAC, so this is strong evidence that this person did not exist by
that name. There were five
(5) Mary Paterson’s in the Great War, but none associated with the
event listed.
There was a Mary Blaikley listed and we retrieved her medal card, which
matches the information that was already on hand.
Mary Blaikley was born in Gartcosh, Scotland (where Mary Paterson
was reported to have resided) and did perish in the aerial torpedo
bombing on May 30, 1918 (where Mary Paterson was reported to have been
killed).
8.
Scotland’s
People – Genealogical Research Database
The Birth Record of Mary Blaikley is provided in Attachment #8.
The Death Record of Mary Blaikley is provided in Attachment #9.
There are no similar records for a “Mary Paterson” of that
era.
The purpose of researching the Genealogical Records of Scotland was to
try to determine if Mary Blaikley could be who is reported as Mary
Paterson.
Mary McLachlan Blaikley was found in the records, born in 1897 in the
Glasgow Area (District of Cadder, County of Lanark).
She was born at 10:45 pm to Elizabeth Blaikley, a farm servant.
Mary Blaikley was an illegitimate child.
There are absolutely no records for any birth, marriage or death
for a Mary Peterson in that same period, although there are 14 Mary
Paterson births in the records.
There is a statutory death certificate for Mary Blaikley which agrees
with all the other information. She
was listed as killed in action on May 30, 1918 at the age of 20.
Her birth records show that she was born to Elizabeth Blaikley at
10:45 pm on December 24, 1896 in Cadder, Lanark.
Most important to this research is that she was born in GARTCOSH, Cadder,
which is a match to the community in the letter sent to the Paterson’s
in Canada. What are the odds
that the person that is suspected of being the person shown as “Mary
Paterson” came from the same town and also lived with her grandfather?
A search of the marriage records for John Paterson in this era and area
showed 11 records but no marriages to an Elizabeth Blaikley.
9.
Queen Mary’s
Army Auxiliary Corps
QMAAC records have been searched online and no record was found
of Mary Paterson. Independent
researchers have checked the QMAAC records in the United Kingdom and
they have confirmed that there is no listing, at any time, for a Mary
Paterson.
The women listed as being killed on that fateful day in May 1918
are as follows (plus one who died of wounds) are Blaikley; Campbell;
Connor; Grant; Moores; Thomasson; Parker; Caswell and Watson (died later
of wounds)
Concluding Remarks:
There
is evidence to suggest that the person reported is one “Mary
Blaikley” and that she was the illegitimate child of Elizabeth
Blaikley, who may or may not have been Mrs. John Paterson who might
later be from Milton, Ontario. If
she was, John Paterson may have been Mary's father and Elizabeth
Blaikley may have been John's wife, but there are no records to support
that possibility. John Paterson may have married Elizabeth Blaikley
after the birth of Mary Blaikley.
There
is no evidence whatsoever to support any claim that there was a person
by the name of “Mary Paterson” that was killed in the aerial torpedo
attack of May 30, 1918.
Even
if this “Mary” was the daughter of Private and Mrs. John Paterson,
she never traveled to or resided in Canada and thus is not entitled to
have her name on a Canadian War Memorial. If she was, the name should
read “Mary Blaikley” and not “Mary Paterson” as there is no such
person registered in Canada or the United Kingdom at that time.
It
is important to maintain the integrity of historical investigations,
If this error is not corrected now, some 4 years after the error
was made, there is a chance that the error will be perpetuated and that
at some future time another researcher will use the Victoria Park
Cenotaph as evidence of the existence of Mary Paterson.
One error in 2004 will thus perpetuate an error past 2008.
Action Required:
The
name “Mary Paterson” should be removed from the Cenotaph and the
error in the Milton Historical Society book “Milton Remembers WWI”
should be corrected.
If
anyone has information contrary to the above, please contact the author
at miltonsoldiers@gmail.com.
Attachments:
(see
PDF version)
1.
Milton Cenotaph Photograph
2.
John Paterson Attestation Papers
3.
Milton Champion Letters of 1918
4.
Commonwealth War Graves
Commission Records
5.
Nominal Roll of the QMAAC Killed
in Action on May 30, 1918
6.
Australian War Museum –
Photographs of QMAAC Funeral
7.
United Kingdom National Archives
Medal Index Card
8.
Scotland Genealogical Record –
Birth of Mary Blaikley
9. Scotland
Genealogical Record – Death of Mary Blaikley